NEUROCYBERNETIC PERSPECTIVE 3)4)
← Back
"A metaphor that emphasises active learning and control rather that the passive adaptation that characterises the "open system" view (R.L. FLOOD and M.C. JACKSON, 1991, p.10).
These authors stresses the interest of this view for management and organization theory. They compare the positive and negative aspects of the same:
"Useful
"- It promotes self-inquiry and self-criticism and therefore the possibility of dynamic goalseeking based on learning
"- When there is a high degree of uncertainty it encourages creativity
"When and why does it break down in practice:
" – It tends to forget that the purposes of the parts may not always be the same as the purposes of the whole
"- Adopting recommendations based on this metaphor would require most extant organizations to undergo significant changes that would threaten those that are favoured by the status quo; so they will be resisted
"- It neglects to recognise that organizations are socially constructed phenomena" (p.11)
As to this last point, it seems however that the neurocybernetic model could also help to reach a better understanding of social constructs.
Categories
- 1) General information
- 2) Methodology or model
- 3) Epistemology, ontology and semantics
- 4) Human sciences
- 5) Discipline oriented
Publisher
Bertalanffy Center for the Study of Systems Science(2020).
To cite this page, please use the following information:
Bertalanffy Center for the Study of Systems Science (2020). Title of the entry. In Charles François (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Systems and Cybernetics (2). Retrieved from www.systemspedia.org/[full/url]
We thank the following partners for making the open access of this volume possible: