HOLOGRAPHY as a metaphor 3)
← Back
A way to represent a whole as a network of connected and more or less redundant elements, allowing simultaneously for specialization and a global coherent behavior.
The brain is now widely supposed to have an holographic organization.
A. HAUAN, J.A. JOHANNESSEN and J. OLAISEN characterize this metaphor as follows: "… the whole is enclosed in its parts: More specifically, if a holographic picture is broken into pieces, any single piece, when enlarged, will display all images of the original picture, al-though maybe somewhat blurred. As a consequence, the "whole" could conceivably be reconstructed through a thorough analysis of any of the constituents parts" (1992, p.1057).
The metaphor implies that, within a system, any element should have (and in biological and cultural system, have indeed, as genes, memes, or mindscapes) at least a kind of historical imprint of the global identity of the system.
The holographic metaphor is as old as 19th Century's Arnold BÖCKLIN's "Public opinion" engraving that shows a gigantic dragon made of a multitude of similar dragonlets collectively self-organized in the suited way to ensure self-similarity between the micro- and the macro level.
Categories
- 1) General information
- 2) Methodology or model
- 3) Epistemology, ontology and semantics
- 4) Human sciences
- 5) Discipline oriented
Publisher
Bertalanffy Center for the Study of Systems Science(2020).
To cite this page, please use the following information:
Bertalanffy Center for the Study of Systems Science (2020). Title of the entry. In Charles François (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Systems and Cybernetics (2). Retrieved from www.systemspedia.org/[full/url]
We thank the following partners for making the open access of this volume possible: