BCSSS

International Encyclopedia of Systems and Cybernetics

2nd Edition, as published by Charles François 2004 Presented by the Bertalanffy Center for the Study of Systems Science Vienna for public access.

About

The International Encyclopedia of Systems and Cybernetics was first edited and published by the system scientist Charles François in 1997. The online version that is provided here was based on the 2nd edition in 2004. It was uploaded and gifted to the center by ASC president Michael Lissack in 2019; the BCSSS purchased the rights for the re-publication of this volume in 200?. In 2018, the original editor expressed his wish to pass on the stewardship over the maintenance and further development of the encyclopedia to the Bertalanffy Center. In the future, the BCSSS seeks to further develop the encyclopedia by open collaboration within the systems sciences. Until the center has found and been able to implement an adequate technical solution for this, the static website is made accessible for the benefit of public scholarship and education.

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

DEFINITION 3)

← Back

A statement aiming at establishing the precise meaning of a term or expression.

The problem of definition is central to systemic and cybernetic semantics.

In J. WARFIELD's words: "… the definition of a term is in itself an operation of integration, but what is integrated varies from one approach to another" (1988, p.335).

WARFIELD establishes the following taxonomy of definitions:

"Definition by Naming. In this, the weakest form of definition, a concept is given a unique name and that is all that is overtly available to give it an identity.

"Second, one may consider Definition by Extension. In this mode, well established historically, one deals with a class name. The class is defined by presenting a set of names of exemplars of the class. This approach may often serve for initial introduction to a concept. It does not provide the depth of insight to allow one to answer such a critical question as to whether a concept X, not yet accepted as a member of the class, can or should belong to the class.

"Thirdly, one may consider Definition by intension. In this mode, one deals with a concept (which can be a class), and defines the concept by citing that set of attributes that is perceived to be integral to the concept. Oddly, this approach may involve both a division and an integration. The integration brings together a set of attributes thought to belong to the concept, while at the same time producing a division of the concept into the set of attributes, leaving open questions of completeness at times.

"A fourth type of definition is Definition by Relationship… but the extent of the relationship is a matter of considerable importance… Definition by Relationship is the highest grade of the four modes discussed" (p. 335-6).

Definition by Relationship implies the use of DE MORGAN's Theory of Relations, whose systemic and cybernetic character is obvious.

The basic methodology used in this dictionary is definition by relationship, taking in account that any language (current, specialized or formalized) tends to be organizationally closed.

Categories

  • 1) General information
  • 2) Methodology or model
  • 3) Epistemology, ontology and semantics
  • 4) Human sciences
  • 5) Discipline oriented

Publisher

Bertalanffy Center for the Study of Systems Science(2020).

To cite this page, please use the following information:

Bertalanffy Center for the Study of Systems Science (2020). Title of the entry. In Charles François (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Systems and Cybernetics (2). Retrieved from www.systemspedia.org/[full/url]

We thank the following partners for making the open access of this volume possible:

© 2020 BCSSS Contact/Imprint