CONTEXTUAL IMPLICATION 3)
← Back
This notion was introduced by C.S. PEIRCE and retaken by J. WARFIELD, who explains it as follows:
"Every question involves contextual implication
"In the first instance, CI refers to:
a) The linguistic demand placed on the recipient of the question
b) The hypotheses that underlie the question
"In the second instance, CI refers to:
a) The (implied) questions to which those hypotheses are possible answers, and
b) The contextual implication of the implied questions
c) The hypotheses underlying those questions
"and so on until a possible point is reached where there is no contextual implication. If such a point is reached it is in the axiomatic domain" (pers com.)
This concept is basic to any systemic inquiry because it helps to avoid undue simplifications. However, a limit must be put to the process, i.e. must be clearly perceived and stated.
Categories
- 1) General information
- 2) Methodology or model
- 3) Epistemology, ontology and semantics
- 4) Human sciences
- 5) Discipline oriented
Publisher
Bertalanffy Center for the Study of Systems Science(2020).
To cite this page, please use the following information:
Bertalanffy Center for the Study of Systems Science (2020). Title of the entry. In Charles François (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Systems and Cybernetics (2). Retrieved from www.systemspedia.org/[full/url]
We thank the following partners for making the open access of this volume possible: