CONSENSUS METHODOLOGIES 1)4)
← Back
Various authors coincide on the need of creating consensus among people who may hold different and even divergent views about issues that are of concern to them (knowingly or not).
The first step should be to establish a honest and as complete as possible list of stakeholders, including probable future ones in accordance with the also probable developments of the situation, or as a result of the decisions to be made, and the actions to be furthered (MITROFF & LINSTONE, 1993)
Thereafter, it is absolutely essential to avoid blindspots and underconceptualization about the nature and characteristics of the issue or situation (J. WARFIELD, 1989 a, 1994b)
And of course, no consensus can be reached (and maintained in an evolving way) without free and widely open exchanges of opinions among the stakeholders (G. PASK, 1975, 1976; CONSISTENCY 121 J. WARFIELD, 1994b) In order to promote these exchanges, B.H. BANATHYorganized and developed the FUSCHL and the ASILOMAR Conversations, as practical training group activities.
→ Conversation; Generic design science; Group technique (Nominal); Design (Coparticipative); Design methodology (Systemic)
Categories
- 1) General information
- 2) Methodology or model
- 3) Epistemology, ontology and semantics
- 4) Human sciences
- 5) Discipline oriented
Publisher
Bertalanffy Center for the Study of Systems Science(2020).
To cite this page, please use the following information:
Bertalanffy Center for the Study of Systems Science (2020). Title of the entry. In Charles François (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Systems and Cybernetics (2). Retrieved from www.systemspedia.org/[full/url]
We thank the following partners for making the open access of this volume possible: